This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Sometime in the early years of the current century, a group of powerful advocates who thought that too many children were being placed in fostercare came up with a proposal for change that they called “child welfare finance reform.” … So under Family First, we created new federal funding for those services.
In her 2009 book, Shattered Bonds: The Color of Child Welfare , Dorothy Roberts drew attention to the disproportional representation of Black children in fostercare and child welfare in general and helped make “racial disproportionality” a buzzword in the child welfare world.
It fails because even when you really mean it, under this system, the prerequisite for prevention is inflicting trauma on children and families by interrogating and stripsearching children in the middle of the night, at best, and hauling them off to the chaos of fostercare at worst. No, you cant fight trauma with trauma.
.” It does not define RTF’s, but the term clearly refers to facilities that provide behavioral health services in a residential context to children with funding from programs under SFC jurisdiction, mainly Medicaid and fostercare funds under Title IV-E of the Social Security Act.
Further delay to the reform of children’s social care will prolong the “crisis” the sector is in and increase costs, charities have warned in response to the Budget. However, this was dependent on the reforms being implemented from 2023-24. “Further delays will see [costs] escalate.”
“New Federal Report Demonstrates Reduction in Child Maltreatment Victims and Underscores Need for Continued Action,” the Administration on Children and Families (ACF) of the US Department of Health and Human Services proclaimed in releasing the latest annual report on the government response to child abuse and neglect.
Councils are referring more children from residential to fostercare, independent fostering agencies (IFAs) have reported. Children making significant progress in residential care due to effective therapeutic interventions, making them ready and willing to move to a family-like setting.
Theyre feeding the tapeworm in the system Because, remember *-The institutions serve two populations, foster children taken from their own parents by force of law, and children placed voluntarily by desperate parents unable to cope, and who have no other option. They absolutely do belong in fostercare or, far better, in their own homes.
The latest McLawsuit reinforces ugly stereotypes about who loses children to fostercare. ● s childhood had the hallmarks of trauma and instability that DCFS is accustomed to seeing in children entering fostercare, including early childhood abuse and neglect, family violence, frequent moves, and unstable placements.
For them, intervention by the family police is, literally, the norm. In addition, Emily takes a “holistic approach” to her family’s health that includes “declining certain medical interventions during her pregnancies and declining to vaccinate her sons.” How might a family like this handle medical care during a future pregnancy?
The study looks at every step of the process, from investigations to how often a caseworker claims a case is “substantiated” to entries into fostercare to termination of children’s rights to their parents (a more accurate term than termination of parental rights). A child abuse investigation is not a benign act. Yes, second highest.
And, precisely because most cases we think of when we hear the words “child abuse” are nothing like the horror stories and far more like the case of Logan Marr, the data show that, almost always, family preservation is safer than fostercare. You can read about those data here and here. See above for the links.) Source: U.S.
The harms of removal and sometimes also fostercare can produce “worse long-term outcomes than if the child had remained at home” in many cases … But Michigan’s removal statutes do not require courts to balance these harms against the harm that might result from staying home. In contrast, McCormack wrote, when Washington D.C.
. ● At the end of 2021, NPR exposed the hideous practice of forcing parents to pay ransom to get their kids back from fostercare. (No, The stories prompted the federal government to issue new guidance opposing the practice and several states and localities are promising to at least curb it. . ●
And it’s important to draw a distinction between that one element of government – the family police – and government as a whole. I think government can play a huge, constructive role in promoting the well-being of children. I am a lifelong tax-and-spend liberal and proud of it. But the family police cannot.
Last month, two online news sites published more than 10,000 words about fostercare in West Virginia. THE CITY reports on a fight in the New York City Council over whether ACS will continue to be able to run roughshod over families. ? Not one of those words came from a birth parent.
Child Welfare Specialist : Social workers in this role focus on the safety and well-being of children, often within the context of child protective services or fostercare systems. They involve clients in decision-making processes and encourage them to actively participate in setting goals and developing intervention plans.
The legislation mandates early intervention to keep families intact when possible and reduce the need for fostercare. This is the process of functional governing.” The January briefing was one of several congressional briefings CRISP organized to support fostercare legislation.
Hierarchy of support Overall, it found that authorities were most likely to support to family and friends foster carers, followed by carers with a special guardianship order (SGO) for the child and then those with a child arrangements order or residence order (CAO/RO) giving them parental responsibility. ” . ”
In addition, seven areas are testing providing family support network packages to help extended families care for children and avoid them going into care. “If the government were minded there are things they could do to manage and sort that.”
The government must invest in specialist placements to reform a care system not working for vulnerable teenagers and protect them from exploitation. As of March 2021, 10- to 15-year-olds accounted for 39% of children in care, and those over 16 23%, according to government statistics. Horror stories’.
Most assessments had a clear purpose and rationale for intervention, with direct work providing valuable insights into children’s experiences, and their needs being well-considered by plans that also included their wishes and feelings. .” Practice better beyond the MASH.
The government has delayed its response to the Independent Review of Children’s Social Care until next year. Resource concerns following autumn statement. However, Coutinho did not provide details on how it was looking to increase placement numbers.
Ofsted also found that children came into care at the right time after careful consideration, with social workers being “tenacious” in supporting children to live with extended families where possible. The inspectorate said the council now had stronger governance of children’s services, of which it had undertaken a full restructure.
And in its report on social care last year, the CMA found that councils “can struggle to collaborate successfully due to risk aversion, budgetary constraints, differences in governance, and difficulties aligning priorities and sharing costs”. It concluded this was unlikely to change without action by central government.
This interdisciplinary approach allows for a holistic and comprehensive understanding of the challenges people face, leading to more effective interventions and support systems. Advocacy for Vulnerable Populations One of the primary responsibilities of a social worker is to advocate for the rights and well-being of vulnerable populations.
Some advocates in Maine have tried to use one data point in the federal governments annual Child Maltreatment report to justify the states ongoing foster-care panic. To move away from the ineffective intervention of mandatory reporting, policymakers must decriminalize absenteeism. The AFT has an overview here.
I would love to learn more about interventions that improve the mental wellness of oppressed youth. Upon graduation, my goal is to work with The Department of Children and Families and continue to work with children in fostercare and help aid sibling reunification. Awards Rollin Williams/Y.C. The School of Social Work Ph.D.
Or the judge who wouldnt return the children because these children have lived in unstable living arrangements long enough dooming the children to be split from each other into separate foster homes, moved from placement to placement to the point that two of them had to spend a night in a family police agency office.
The Child Welfare League of America, a trade association for public and private family policing agencies, many of which are paid for each day they hold a child in fostercare, called CAPTA “foundational to the country’s ability to prevent child abuse and neglect.” Nah, just kidding. maybe it’s poverty, but it’s not just poverty.
That family—especially if they are black or brown–might find themselves a couple of steps away from a fostercareintervention when what they really needed were options that money can literally buy, like clothing, food, and child care. [5]. Saving money and sparing children from harm?
● Dr. Sharon McDaniel, a pioneer in doing kinship fostercare the right way, speaks out about the enormous harm of doing it the wrong way – through the subterfuge known as “hidden fostercare.” And imagine if the price for not meeting the government spy’s standard for “well-being” were to have the child taken forever.
This would be an overreach in the roles and responsibilities of a government agency. Both divisions of this same agency are ultimately overseen by Erin Dalton, who is as nonchalant about the harm of fostercare as she is fanatical in her desire to vacuum up data about poor people. Emphasis added.]
With a few notable exceptions (generally written by nonwhite reporters), the Globe follows the party line of those whose 19 th Century counterparts proudly called themselves “child savers” – that massive intervention into families is needed to keep children safe. In this story, America’s foremost scholar on family policing and race, Prof.
Apparently only a Harvard professor can tell the difference between those cries and these , from children taken at the Mexican border: For the Perkins-Sabey children, the experience in fostercare was probably the least awful it can be. Well, that’s probably somewhere around half of all fostercare cases.
It didn’t matter if they were institutionalized by government or private faith-based agencies. The child died in fostercare We’ll never know if those federal funds might have made a difference I have a blog post about it. ● And those are only the ones we know about.) In some ways the faculty is catching up.
Yet this hypothetical anti-terrorism law already is the law governing the system we call “child welfare.” Last year, the Texas legislature considered a bill to modestly narrow the grounds for coercive intervention into families and make it harder to confuse poverty with neglect.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 25,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content