This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Sometime in the early years of the current century, a group of powerful advocates who thought that too many children were being placed in fostercare came up with a proposal for change that they called “child welfare finance reform.” … So under Family First, we created new federal funding for those services.
For the Donlins, their nightmare at the hands of the family police, known in Iowa as the Department of HumanServices, consisted of eight months of hypersurveillance and an attempt to take away their young children. They hauled the family into court and threatened to throw the children into fostercare.
“New Federal Report Demonstrates Reduction in Child Maltreatment Victims and Underscores Need for Continued Action,” the Administration on Children and Families (ACF) of the US Department of Health and HumanServices proclaimed in releasing the latest annual report on the government response to child abuse and neglect.
Theyre like treasure troves of successful ideas created by government agencies and research institutions to help you make informed decisions. How Clearinghouses Help You Succeed Clearinghouses let communities and government agencies explore what has been tested and proven to work. What Are Evidence-Based Clearinghouses?
And, precisely because most cases we think of when we hear the words “child abuse” are nothing like the horror stories and far more like the case of Logan Marr, the data show that, almost always, family preservation is safer than fostercare. You can read about those data here and here. See above for the links.) Source: U.S.
The harms of removal and sometimes also fostercare can produce “worse long-term outcomes than if the child had remained at home” in many cases … But Michigan’s removal statutes do not require courts to balance these harms against the harm that might result from staying home. In contrast, McCormack wrote, when Washington D.C.
He spoke these words when nearly half of the children in the family regulation system were Black, most were poor, and the federal government was rapidly draining social safety nets. In Arizona, for example, nearly every impoverished Black child will be subjected to a child abuse investigation and 20% will be forced into fostercare.
Sometimes one small detail from a government document tells a huge story – especially when a good reporter adds a little context. Vermont’s humanservices agency continued to send teens there — even after the incidents. This story from The Imprint has a good summary of Prof.
In 43 Essential Policies for HumanServices Professionals , Gerald O’Brien provides a resource to overcome these challenges, because policy familiarity contributes to social workers’ fundamental understanding of the individuals, communities, institutions, and governments they serve.
Back to Blogs Child Welfare Blog Colorado Juvenile Parole Board (JPB) Seeking Applications to Fill One Public At-Large Seat The JPB is a nine-member, Type 1 transfer board, supported by staff housed in the Office of Children, Youth, and Families (OCYF) within the Colorado Department of HumanServices (CDHS).
Department of Health and HumanServices, Child Welfare Information Gateway, 2018 The State Assembly holds a hearing Oct. In 10 states,* the investigating and family-separating is a local government function. Source: U.S. That state agency runs the hotline and that state agency does the investigations and takes away the children.
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court has issued a scathing rebuke to Philadelphia’s family police agency, the Department of HumanServices, rejecting the idea that its caseworkers are effectively exempt from the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution and a similar clause in Pennsylvania’s constitution.
We can do that because we have actual evidence that, in the overwhelming majority of cases, family preservation is not only more humane than fostercare or massive surveillance, it’s also safer. That may help explain how a tragedy like this death in fostercare could occur. ● 27 of this year.
A wise, nurturing community-run humanservices system, working with the whole family, easily could have dealt with that; there were those huge reserves of love to work with. The federal government effectively nullified his veteran’s mortgage by redlining his neighborhood. She rebelled by getting into fights.
Or the judge who wouldnt return the children because these children have lived in unstable living arrangements long enough dooming the children to be split from each other into separate foster homes, moved from placement to placement to the point that two of them had to spend a night in a family police agency office.
Department of HumanServices, went to great lengths to spin the results and direct readers toward the spin instead of the reviews themselves. Identifying and proactively targeting services to families with no [child welfare services] involvement is a violation of families’ privacy and their rights to parent as they see fit.
That state’s child welfare “ombudsman” and a former lawmaker with a particularly ugly track record have been fueling a foster-care panic , leading an effort to tear apart a system that once, briefly was, relatively speaking, a national model. If anything, this kind of misuse of data is even worse in Maine. Casey Foundation.
Fong asks in a commentary for the Hartford Courant if the head of the state’s family police agency will make sure there’s no foster-care panic. She writes: DCF has expressed a commitment to keeping families together, and has worked, impressively, to decrease fostercare caseloads and refer families to community supports.
Oh but this is different, those who’ve rallied round the foster parents would say. The foster parents in this case didn’t do anything illegal – in fact the placement was authorized by a government agency, and the foster parents probably have the best of intentions. Yet somehow, A.N.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 25,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content