This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
This phenomenological study was based on in-depth interviews designed to gain a better understanding of the lived experiences of 13 licensed social workers who participated in licensing investigations and received sanctions by a state licensing board for violating state laws, rules, or ethical standards.
This is because they develop treatment plans to address mental illness and substance abuse problems, often holding supervisory roles and advocating for human rights within the criminaljustice system. This may include personal interviews, family histories, and the review of relevant documents.
It involved five annual online surveys, which were answered by between 78 and 157 of the 404 practitioners who qualified in 2016, interviews with a sample of participants in years one, three and five and focus groups in years two, three and four. The final year’s survey included questions on the impact of Covid-19.
In its Study of the Root Causes of Juvenile Justice System Involvement ,” the District of Columbia’s CriminalJustice Coordinating Council interviewed youth service providers with first-hand experience working with justice-involved and at-risk youth.
Ensuring that criminaljustice and safeguarding agencies work together to robustly assess and manage of people who present a risk of sexual harm and who have contact with children. ‘Robust strategy needed’ “The systemic issues identified in this report are longstanding,” said panel chair Annie Hudson.
This exclusion does not apply to part 3 patients (those in the criminaljustice system). It also introduces an “opt-out” system, whereby hospital managers and others are required to notify advocacy services about qualifying patients and those services must then arrange for patients to be interviewed to find out if they want an IMHA.
It took 18 months of reporting, more than 150 interviews, and a lawsuit to obtain relevant documents. In no place in the American criminal-justice system, he reportedly testified, would it be considered either ethically or legally permissible to keep children from their parents for punitive purposes after their legal process is completed.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 25,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content