This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
This $4 billion settlement is the latest illustration of the fact that the entire model of American childwelfare was built on a false premise: that child removal equals child safety. So let's apply the rhetoric weve heard from the childwelfare establishment decade after decade to these cases.
In fact, the control the government demands can predate conception. If anything these decisions go farther depriving children of their mothers and t heir fathers if the fathers exercise insufficient control over their partners pregnancies.
But Burkhammer wants to prohibit West Virginias family police agency (a more accurate term than childwelfare agency) from screening out any report from a mandated reporter and they make the overwhelming majority of reports. So once again, a failure of childwelfare is worsened by a failure of journalism.
At last: A group involved in oversight of Maine childwelfare that shows a real understanding of the problems. The Maine ChildWelfare Advisory Panel (MCWAP) Citizen Review Panel has produced a report with six recommendations. Note that often these programs have the full support of state or local childwelfare agencies.
The federal government has released state-by-state data for the number of children taken from their parents in FFY 2021 (yes, they always run about a year late). The big national takeaway is that these data – once again – refute the racist myth about COVID-19 and “childwelfare.” And NCCPR has updated our rate-of-removal index.
But it’s hard to imagine anything that more perfectly captures the banality of childwelfare thinking than this waste of $20 million: Five organizations will spend this federal grant money to create a “Quality Improvement Center on Engaging Youth in Finding Permanency.” There are many such groups. Oh, don’t get me wrong.
Vivek Sankaran, director of the Child Advocacy Law Clinic and the ChildWelfare Appellate Clinic at the University Michigan Law School summed it up perfectly: In many ways, the decision was unexceptional. We wouldn’t even allow a slight deviation from the rules. Lawyers would scream. Appellate courts would intervene.
More than just a dissent in an individual case, this opinion is a call to transform “childwelfare” in Michigan – and everywhere else. is a brilliant dissection of the failings of both law and practice in “childwelfare” in Michigan and pretty much everywhere else in America.
They even acknowledged their own role in “contributing to racism in the legal field” in general and “within the childwelfare legal field in particular…” Offhand, I can’t think of an organization that says “establishment” more than the American Bar Association. The topic is “anti-Black systemic racism within the childwelfare system.”
The Indian ChildWelfare Act (ICWA) of 1978 is a federal law that recognizes tribal sovereignty and governs jurisdiction over the removal of Native American (Indian) children from their families.
States have been hard-put to devise plans for implementing the new services because the bill was designed to fix a problem that did not exist–the alleged absence of childwelfare services designed to help families stay together. ” As the ChildWelfare Information Gateway, an information clearinghouse of the U.S.
She is the state’s “Child Advocate,” and before that ran a prestigious private agency specializing in adoption and foster care. Like most people in “childwelfare” her intentions are good. There is, in fact, a place for government in assisting with children’s wellbeing. She has repeatedly misused her power and privilege.
Child Advocate" Maria Mossaides Who in the world could be against something like that? If you’ve followed Massachusetts childwelfare at all, you know exactly who: Massachusetts’ Fearmonger-in-Chief, state “child advocate” Maria Mossaides. Unfortunately, much of childwelfare operates with a pre- Gault mentality.
Interviews with boarding school survivors, childwelfare leaders and tribal members reveal a mix of concern and cautious optimism that the work [former Interior Secretary Deb] Haaland set in motion will continue. Childwelfares crimes against Native Americans arent just in the past.
How do we solve child neglect, how do we keep children safe in this country? And so, we are not requiring the government to come in and police them and say this is how you need to raise your children. What accounts for these results? We give families money. We give families money so they can keep their own family safe.
The number of ways family policing agencies (a more accurate term than “childwelfare” agencies) can hurt the children they are mandated to protect is limited only by their imagination – and, unfortunately, this is the one area where they show any imagination at all. But there is an agency in New York that could fix that.
Often, when I single out for criticism particular stories about “childwelfare” – or as it should be called family policing, it’s because the reporter never bothered to even speak to parents who have had their children taken, or to lawyers for such parents. It’s not like the state can’t afford to step in and provide this money.
Back to Blogs Community Blog ChildWelfare Blog Using Evidence-Based Clearinghouses Finding the Right Program for Your Community: Why Reinvent the Wheel? Theyre like treasure troves of successful ideas created by government agencies and research institutions to help you make informed decisions. strong, moderate, promising).
It turns out, Paris Hilton knows more about "residential treatment facilities" than at least one self-proclaimed "childwelfare scholar." By pretending that this industry has nothing to do with his sacred, beloved “childwelfare” system. So how did Barth respond? It’s not a matter of ill-motivation. But Paris Hilton does.
Year after year, states and the federal government continue to release annual data showing a decline in the number of children in foster care, congratulating themselves on keeping families together. Of course the supporters of FFPSA ignored this basic fact and claimed the legislation would revolutionize childwelfare!).
Capitol Visitor Center, First Street and East Capitol Street, Washington, DC 20515, to explore legislative remedies should the Supreme Court overturn the constitutionality of the Indian ChildWelfare Act (ICWA). They urged the Supreme Court to “uphold the Indian ChildWelfare Act’s constitutionality in all respects.”
That mean old state government makes us do it! But sheesh, all that whining! Over and over again he offers the same response: It’s not my fault! And yet, Dannhauser ignored the obvious solution. That should make us wonder if he really just wants to keep things as they are.
Roberts’ essay for the Summer issue of Dissent , which begins this way: Imagine if there were an arm of the state that sent government agents to invade Black people’s homes, kept them under intense and indefinite surveillance, regulated their daily lives, and forcibly separated their families, often permanently. See also Prof.
The big liberal “childwelfare” groups, the ChildWelfare League of America, the one that now calls itself “Social Current” and the Children’s Defense Fund, among others, were just fine with it. The temporary best interests of the child may be to move him or her into a foster home. First you take their money away.
Here's step one: Right now, we're seeing the childwelfare establishment respond to calls for abolition by talking about "system transformation." But if government agencies, foundations and institutions actually want to seed transformation, they will need to yield significant power. ●
While Black children make up 14% of the United States child population, they account for 20% of those entering the childwelfare system. Similarly, American Indian and Native Alaskan children are 1% of the US child population, but account for over 2% of those entering care. LGBTQIA+ children are also over-represented.
Is Pittsburgh’s “childwelfare” predictive analytics algorithm running amok? The Allegheny Family Screening Tool slaps an invisible scarlet number "risk score" on every child whose parents or other caretakers have been accused of neglect. Inquiring minds (at the US Dept. of Justice) want to know!
Abdurahman also moderated this international conference panel, Abolishing the ChildWelfare System (and its Algorithms!) The Imprint reports on a United Nations committee in Geneva that heard testimony about the racism that permeates the American childwelfare system and asked tough questions of U.S. with panelists Prof.
In the decades, indeed in the centuries before passage of the Indian ChildWelfare Act, U.S. childwelfare” policy toward Native Americans fit that definition. ICWA is often described as the “gold standard” for “childwelfare” law and policy. It’s not as if anyone tried to hide it.
The Children’s Charities Coalition issued the message after the government indicated that “fundamental reform” of the sector would be implemented from April 2026 at the earliest, in its Budget document, published yesterday. However, this was dependent on the reforms being implemented from 2023-24.
Dorothy Roberts of the University of Pennsylvania, a member of NCCPR’s Board of Directors, just wrote a book called Torn Apart: How the ChildWelfare System Destroys Black Families--and How Abolition Can Build a Safer World. The first, Shattered Bonds: The Color of ChildWelfare was published 20 years ago. She’s right.
That much is clear to anyone who bothers to look at the data that New Jersey shares with the federal government through the National Child Abuse and Neglect Data System (NCANDS) and which the federal Children’s Bureau shares through its annual Child Maltreatment reports.
Maine’s child population is only four percent Hispanic, but more than one-quarter of them will be forced into foster care and 15% of them will lose their parents forever. That state’s childwelfare “ombudsman” issues reports indicating she’s never seen a problem with wrongful removal in Maine. In 2021, there were 1,753.
Bad as it is for any child to be torn from their home and consigned to the chaos of foster care, it’s worse for LGBTQ children – the very children now targeted by Texas Gov. Even childwelfare establishment types, like this professor , are for it. Greg Abbott. NCCPR Board Member Prof. But in some states, that’s not true.
● Think you know all about the cases at the heart of the current challenge to the Indian ChildWelfare Act? The federal government released its annual Child Maltreatment report. The federal government released its annual Child Maltreatment report. The Imprint has a summary.
? As almost everyone reading this probably knows, the Supreme Court has agreed to hear arguments on the constitutionality of the Indian ChildWelfare Act which The Imprint calls “a bedrock law passed in the 1970s to combat cultural genocide committed against Indigenous families.” ? They were less rushed; their kids were less rushed.
That’s because, if you read this Blog regularly, you probably work in or study “childwelfare.” Childwelfare” is not run by the federal government. In Florida, the late George Sheldon made curbing the drugging of foster children a cause when he ran the state “childwelfare” agency.
The story also is a good object lesson in a common childwelfare practice: taking an excellent program, diluting the model while keeping the name, and then claiming that “we already have” that program. ?
New data from Pennsylvania confirm: When America’s childwelfare establishment fearmongers predicted that COVID would bring on a “pandemic of child abuse” it was just the usual health terrorism. And then came the claim that, well, even if we didn’t see the surge in 2021, we’ll see it in 2022! It didn’t happen.
Some might say it depicts a dystopian future childwelfare surveillance state. There is a right way and a wrong way to cover the release of the federal government's annual Child Maltreatment report. There’s also a right way and a wrong way to report on the use of “predictive analytics” in childwelfare.
From Josie Pickens and Dean Alan Dettlaff of the upEND movement, in the Houston Chronicle : “Instead of making children safer … ASFA became yet another means for national and state governments to forcibly and permanently remove Black children from their families through a speedy process of terminating parental rights.” ?
If you tell your doctor you smoke, there is no chance the doctor will call a hotline that will send government agents into your home where they may awaken you in the middle of the night, ask traumatic questions, stripsearch you and, possibly, take you away from everyone you know and love and put you in a factory that manufactures carcinogens.
The previous round-up began by comparing a real-life case to the depiction of a dystopian childwelfare surveillance state portrayed in Jessamine Chan’s novel The School for Good Mothers Now, Let Grow has a comprehensive comparison between the novel and the real world of family policing. It is not reassuring. ?
Commission on Civil Rights is examining racism in the New York family policing system (a more accurate term than “childwelfare” system). The New York Advisory Committee to the U.S. New York’s institutional providers of family defense prepared in-depth written testimony that is a report in itself.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 25,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content