This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
In fact, the control the government demands can predate conception. If anything these decisions go farther depriving children of their mothers and t heir fathers if the fathers exercise insufficient control over their partners pregnancies.
That’s a key reason why the federal government now allows partial reimbursement for it. No, it’s not to get “bad parents” off; it’s to craft alternatives to the cookie-cutter no-real-services “service plans” often dished out by agencies like DCS. Between the reimbursement and the reduced foster care costs, this approach also pays for itself.
As an illustration, I am reposting my 2022 review of Roberts’ most recent book, Torn Apart: How the ChildWelfare System Destroys Black Families–and How Abolition Can Build a Safer Worl d. childwelfare system. ” Those who liked Shattered Bonds will likely love Torn Apart.
But Burkhammer wants to prohibit West Virginias family police agency (a more accurate term than childwelfare agency) from screening out any report from a mandated reporter and they make the overwhelming majority of reports. So once again, a failure of childwelfare is worsened by a failure of journalism.
“New Federal Report Demonstrates Reduction in Child Maltreatment Victims and Underscores Need for Continued Action,” the Administration on Children and Families (ACF) of the US Department of Health and Human Services proclaimed in releasing the latest annual report on the government response to child abuse and neglect.
At last: A group involved in oversight of Maine childwelfare that shows a real understanding of the problems. The Maine ChildWelfare Advisory Panel (MCWAP) Citizen Review Panel has produced a report with six recommendations. Note that often these programs have the full support of state or local childwelfare agencies.
A “scholar” who insists there is little or no racial bias in childwelfare writes a “predictive analytics” algorithm for the State of California. Somehow, the contract to write a so-called “independent ethics review” of the algorithm is given to another “scholar” who also insists there is little or no racial bias in childwelfare.
But it’s hard to imagine anything that more perfectly captures the banality of childwelfare thinking than this waste of $20 million: Five organizations will spend this federal grant money to create a “Quality Improvement Center on Engaging Youth in Finding Permanency.” There are many such groups. Oh, don’t get me wrong.
The federal government has released state-by-state data for the number of children taken from their parents in FFY 2021 (yes, they always run about a year late). The big national takeaway is that these data – once again – refute the racist myth about COVID-19 and “childwelfare.” And NCCPR has updated our rate-of-removal index.
States have been hard-put to devise plans for implementing the new services because the bill was designed to fix a problem that did not exist–the alleged absence of childwelfare services designed to help families stay together. ” As the ChildWelfare Information Gateway, an information clearinghouse of the U.S.
Have you noticed something new about the “childwelfare” establishment lately? Barth, you may recall, is the one who declared that – unlike any other profession in America, childwelfare is 100% free of racial bias! I have not tried to correct the typos in those tweets. Let’s have a look, line-by-line.
Vivek Sankaran, director of the Child Advocacy Law Clinic and the ChildWelfare Appellate Clinic at the University Michigan Law School summed it up perfectly: In many ways, the decision was unexceptional. We wouldn’t even allow a slight deviation from the rules. Lawyers would scream. Appellate courts would intervene.
More than just a dissent in an individual case, this opinion is a call to transform “childwelfare” in Michigan – and everywhere else. is a brilliant dissection of the failings of both law and practice in “childwelfare” in Michigan and pretty much everywhere else in America.
But it still fell into some of the traps that characterize much of the journalism of childwelfare – including a crucial misunderstanding of poverty and neglect and one inflammatory claim that, as originally published, was flat wrong. ? And always: New York City has one of the least awful family policing systems in America.
They even acknowledged their own role in “contributing to racism in the legal field” in general and “within the childwelfare legal field in particular…” Offhand, I can’t think of an organization that says “establishment” more than the American Bar Association. The topic is “anti-Black systemic racism within the childwelfare system.”
The Indian ChildWelfare Act (ICWA) of 1978 is a federal law that recognizes tribal sovereignty and governs jurisdiction over the removal of Native American (Indian) children from their families.
Police officers and childwelfare caseworkers were ordering a woman to open her front door. ACS’ game of misdirection New York is one of 13 states in which local governments run family policing systems with some sort of state supervision. Here’s how ProPublica describes one encounter: It was 5:30 a.m.
Attention childwelfare garden partiers: The skunks have arrived Every year, the Kempe Center for the Prevention and Treatment of Child Abuse holds a four-day virtual extravaganza featuring more than 100 panels and speakers from around the world. No one should be required to “be nice to people who do despicable things.”
Interviews with boarding school survivors, childwelfare leaders and tribal members reveal a mix of concern and cautious optimism that the work [former Interior Secretary Deb] Haaland set in motion will continue. Childwelfares crimes against Native Americans arent just in the past.
She is the state’s “Child Advocate,” and before that ran a prestigious private agency specializing in adoption and foster care. Like most people in “childwelfare” her intentions are good. There is, in fact, a place for government in assisting with children’s wellbeing. She has repeatedly misused her power and privilege.
When NCCPR released a comprehensive report on Colorado childwelfare in September 2023, we included a section called Tapeworm in the System. Even more restrictions, more onerous treatment for any child the assessment tool thinks might run away? And what, exactly, does that mean? They were in psychiatric centers or jails.
Child Advocate" Maria Mossaides Who in the world could be against something like that? If you’ve followed Massachusetts childwelfare at all, you know exactly who: Massachusetts’ Fearmonger-in-Chief, state “child advocate” Maria Mossaides. Unfortunately, much of childwelfare operates with a pre- Gault mentality.
How do we solve child neglect, how do we keep children safe in this country? And so, we are not requiring the government to come in and police them and say this is how you need to raise your children. What accounts for these results? We give families money. We give families money so they can keep their own family safe.
The number of ways family policing agencies (a more accurate term than “childwelfare” agencies) can hurt the children they are mandated to protect is limited only by their imagination – and, unfortunately, this is the one area where they show any imagination at all. But there is an agency in New York that could fix that.
With CJMR there’s no way to protect your family from government agencies taking your most basic, and in some cases, most private data, and turning it against you. And, of course, there is nothing to show this actually prevents child abuse. But for America’s giant childwelfare industry of helping professionals, that spoils all the fun.
After decades of expanding the childwelfare surveillance state to the point that more than one in three children and a majority of Black children will be forced to endure the trauma of a child abuse investigation by the time they turn 18, some states have noticed: Theyve been doing the same thing over and over and getting the same lousy results.
Often, when I single out for criticism particular stories about “childwelfare” – or as it should be called family policing, it’s because the reporter never bothered to even speak to parents who have had their children taken, or to lawyers for such parents. It’s not like the state can’t afford to step in and provide this money.
Her new “report” on “permanency” for the American Enterprise Institute, home of Charles Murray , is so full of false premises and false promises that perhaps “permanency” is to childwelfare what “creme” is to food. And adoption isn’t always the happily-ever-after that it’s often claimed to be. Font may not view that as a problem.
Back to Blogs Community Blog ChildWelfare Blog Using Evidence-Based Clearinghouses Finding the Right Program for Your Community: Why Reinvent the Wheel? Theyre like treasure troves of successful ideas created by government agencies and research institutions to help you make informed decisions. strong, moderate, promising).
It turns out, Paris Hilton knows more about "residential treatment facilities" than at least one self-proclaimed "childwelfare scholar." By pretending that this industry has nothing to do with his sacred, beloved “childwelfare” system. So how did Barth respond? It’s not a matter of ill-motivation. But Paris Hilton does.
I am proud to be a part of this project, along with Naomi Schaefer-Riley AEI’s point person on childwelfare, and eminent childwelfare scholars, Emily Putnam-Hornstein of UNC-Chapel Hill and Sarah Font of Penn State. We will continue both to add child fatalities and to broaden the information on each death.
Year after year, states and the federal government continue to release annual data showing a decline in the number of children in foster care, congratulating themselves on keeping families together. Of course the supporters of FFPSA ignored this basic fact and claimed the legislation would revolutionize childwelfare!).
That mean old state government makes us do it! But sheesh, all that whining! Over and over again he offers the same response: It’s not my fault! And yet, Dannhauser ignored the obvious solution. That should make us wonder if he really just wants to keep things as they are.
Capitol Visitor Center, First Street and East Capitol Street, Washington, DC 20515, to explore legislative remedies should the Supreme Court overturn the constitutionality of the Indian ChildWelfare Act (ICWA). They urged the Supreme Court to “uphold the Indian ChildWelfare Act’s constitutionality in all respects.”
Roberts’ essay for the Summer issue of Dissent , which begins this way: Imagine if there were an arm of the state that sent government agents to invade Black people’s homes, kept them under intense and indefinite surveillance, regulated their daily lives, and forcibly separated their families, often permanently. See also Prof.
But the judge disagreed with this request, considering it an infringement on the father’s right to parent his child, and did not wait for New Hampshire to respond. The interstate compact was created primarily to govern cross-border foster care moves. She runs the state’s “Office of the Child Advocate.”
“I started this work in 1988,” said Roberts, a professor at the University of Pennsylvania’s law school and the author of books including “Shattered Bonds” and “Torn Apart,” both about institutional racism in the childwelfare system. “To To get this kind of recognition is very gratifying.
The ChildWelfare League (CWLA), in written testimony submitted to the SFC, added that residential services are “a small but important part of the full array of services” that must be available to meet children’s mental health needs.” ” As evidence, the report cites a 2013 report that showed 28.8
When the grand jury finally issued its report in April, 2024, its central conclusion was that its ability to investigate the case was severely hampered by the law governing the disclosure of reports declared by CPS to be unfounded.
Remember all those scare stories about how, because COVID-19 prevented overwhelmingly white disproportionately middle-class “mandated reporters” from constantly having their “eyes” on children who are neither, their parents would unleash upon their own children a “pandemic of child abuse” ? million Black children.
While Black children make up 14% of the United States child population, they account for 20% of those entering the childwelfare system. Similarly, American Indian and Native Alaskan children are 1% of the US child population, but account for over 2% of those entering care. LGBTQIA+ children are also over-represented.
The Children’s Charities Coalition issued the message after the government indicated that “fundamental reform” of the sector would be implemented from April 2026 at the earliest, in its Budget document, published yesterday. However, this was dependent on the reforms being implemented from 2023-24.
This is the text of the NCCPR’s presentation at the 2024 Kempe Center International Virtual Conference: A Call to Action to Change ChildWelfare What the cover says How many times have we heard it or read it? I think government can play a huge, constructive role in promoting the well-being of children. Let’s start with safety.
Is Pittsburgh’s “childwelfare” predictive analytics algorithm running amok? The Allegheny Family Screening Tool slaps an invisible scarlet number "risk score" on every child whose parents or other caretakers have been accused of neglect. Inquiring minds (at the US Dept. of Justice) want to know!
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 25,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content