This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
What lawmakers didnt realize was that, horrific as were the predations of priests, they were nothing compared to the horrors inflicted in fostercare especially group homes and institutions. So let's apply the rhetoric weve heard from the childwelfare establishment decade after decade to these cases.
In fact, the control the government demands can predate conception. But the worst harm is that inflicted on children forced at best to endure needless harassment and surveillance by family police agencies, at worst denied the chance to live with their own loving fathers and instead consigned to the chaos of fostercare.
But Burkhammer wants to prohibit West Virginias family police agency (a more accurate term than childwelfare agency) from screening out any report from a mandated reporter and they make the overwhelming majority of reports. More will be abused in fostercare. More will emerge years later unable to love or trust anyone.
Year after year, states and the federal government continue to release annual data showing a decline in the number of children in fostercare, congratulating themselves on keeping families together. percent over the previous year 15.6 percent since 2018. “We
Whether fostercare seems like something you’re called to or your are simply curious to learn more, you’re in the right place. On any given day, nearly 407,000 children are in fostercare in America. The primary goal of fostercare is reunification. The Statistics: Children in FosterCare.
States have been hard-put to devise plans for implementing the new services because the bill was designed to fix a problem that did not exist–the alleged absence of childwelfare services designed to help families stay together. Sometimes, in order to prevent the need for fostercare, mom and dad might need a little help.
The federal government has released state-by-state data for the number of children taken from their parents in FFY 2021 (yes, they always run about a year late). The big national takeaway is that these data – once again – refute the racist myth about COVID-19 and “childwelfare.” And NCCPR has updated our rate-of-removal index.
But it’s hard to imagine anything that more perfectly captures the banality of childwelfare thinking than this waste of $20 million: Five organizations will spend this federal grant money to create a “Quality Improvement Center on Engaging Youth in Finding Permanency.” Where oh where to begin. There are many such groups.
At last: A group involved in oversight of Maine childwelfare that shows a real understanding of the problems. The Maine ChildWelfare Advisory Panel (MCWAP) Citizen Review Panel has produced a report with six recommendations. Note that often these programs have the full support of state or local childwelfare agencies.
Interviews with boarding school survivors, childwelfare leaders and tribal members reveal a mix of concern and cautious optimism that the work [former Interior Secretary Deb] Haaland set in motion will continue. Childwelfares crimes against Native Americans arent just in the past.
More than just a dissent in an individual case, this opinion is a call to transform “childwelfare” in Michigan – and everywhere else. is a brilliant dissection of the failings of both law and practice in “childwelfare” in Michigan and pretty much everywhere else in America.
She is the state’s “Child Advocate,” and before that ran a prestigious private agency specializing in adoption and fostercare. Like most people in “childwelfare” her intentions are good. million – and the state would save more than that in reducing needless investigations and fostercare.
This is the model that’s proven so successful in New York City – where a comprehensive evaluation found that it reduced time in fostercare with no compromise of safety. It’s one reason New York City’s rate of removal is well under one-third the rate of Massachusetts, even when rates of child poverty are factored in.
It turns out, Paris Hilton knows more about "residential treatment facilities" than at least one self-proclaimed "childwelfare scholar." By pretending that this industry has nothing to do with his sacred, beloved “childwelfare” system. That’s why you’re in fostercare.” So how did Barth respond?
Vivek Sankaran, director of the Child Advocacy Law Clinic and the ChildWelfare Appellate Clinic at the University Michigan Law School summed it up perfectly: In many ways, the decision was unexceptional. We wouldn’t even allow a slight deviation from the rules. Lawyers would scream. Appellate courts would intervene.
The study found that when COVID-19 forced the city’s family policing agency, the Administration for Children’s Services, to step back and community-run community-based mutual aid organizations stepped up, the trauma of needless investigation and fostercare was significantly reduced, with no compromise of safety.
They even acknowledged their own role in “contributing to racism in the legal field” in general and “within the childwelfare legal field in particular…” Offhand, I can’t think of an organization that says “establishment” more than the American Bar Association. The topic is “anti-Black systemic racism within the childwelfare system.”
Often, when I single out for criticism particular stories about “childwelfare” – or as it should be called family policing, it’s because the reporter never bothered to even speak to parents who have had their children taken, or to lawyers for such parents. It’s not like the state can’t afford to step in and provide this money.
The number of ways family policing agencies (a more accurate term than “childwelfare” agencies) can hurt the children they are mandated to protect is limited only by their imagination – and, unfortunately, this is the one area where they show any imagination at all. OCFS theoretically performs oversight.
Back to Blogs Community Blog ChildWelfare Blog Using Evidence-Based Clearinghouses Finding the Right Program for Your Community: Why Reinvent the Wheel? Theyre like treasure troves of successful ideas created by government agencies and research institutions to help you make informed decisions. strong, moderate, promising).
In recent years, some Kansas children in fostercare have ended up sleeping in childwelfare offices overnight because there were no relatives, foster homes or care centers available. What’s behind this national fostercare placement crisis? But this isn’t what fostercare is for.
The big liberal “childwelfare” groups, the ChildWelfare League of America, the one that now calls itself “Social Current” and the Children’s Defense Fund, among others, were just fine with it. The temporary best interests of the child may be to move him or her into a foster home.
Roberts’ essay for the Summer issue of Dissent , which begins this way: Imagine if there were an arm of the state that sent government agents to invade Black people’s homes, kept them under intense and indefinite surveillance, regulated their daily lives, and forcibly separated their families, often permanently. See also Prof.
Is Pittsburgh’s “childwelfare” predictive analytics algorithm running amok? The Allegheny Family Screening Tool slaps an invisible scarlet number "risk score" on every child whose parents or other caretakers have been accused of neglect. She’s still in fostercare. *-In Inquiring minds (at the US Dept.
S he describes her own experience of retaliation after she complained about one of the private fostercare agencies with which ACS contracts, offers an overview of how “predictive analytics” makes things worse, and makes clear we need to dig deeper into how ACS is using it. ? government representatives – all of which they evaded. ?
The study looks at every step of the process, from investigations to how often a caseworker claims a case is “substantiated” to entries into fostercare to termination of children’s rights to their parents (a more accurate term than termination of parental rights). A child abuse investigation is not a benign act.
Further delay to the reform of children’s social care will prolong the “crisis” the sector is in and increase costs, charities have warned in response to the Budget. However, this was dependent on the reforms being implemented from 2023-24. “Further delays will see [costs] escalate.”
Here's step one: Right now, we're seeing the childwelfare establishment respond to calls for abolition by talking about "system transformation." But if government agencies, foundations and institutions actually want to seed transformation, they will need to yield significant power. ●
That mean old state government makes us do it! But sheesh, all that whining! Over and over again he offers the same response: It’s not my fault! And yet, Dannhauser ignored the obvious solution. That should make us wonder if he really just wants to keep things as they are.
Capitol Visitor Center, First Street and East Capitol Street, Washington, DC 20515, to explore legislative remedies should the Supreme Court overturn the constitutionality of the Indian ChildWelfare Act (ICWA). They urged the Supreme Court to “uphold the Indian ChildWelfare Act’s constitutionality in all respects.”
Bad as it is for any child to be torn from their home and consigned to the chaos of fostercare, it’s worse for LGBTQ children – the very children now targeted by Texas Gov. Only 17 percent of children enter fostercare based on allegations they were physically or sexually abused. Greg Abbott.
According to Virginia Public Media : Avula noted Virginia’s rate of placement with relatives is less than half of the national average — a statistic he said is skewed by the fact that local social services departments in the state prioritize informal placements with relatives before sending a child into the fostercare system.
Dorothy Roberts of the University of Pennsylvania, a member of NCCPR’s Board of Directors, just wrote a book called Torn Apart: How the ChildWelfare System Destroys Black Families--and How Abolition Can Build a Safer World. The first, Shattered Bonds: The Color of ChildWelfare was published 20 years ago. She’s right.
But it turns out the authors took as much care with the substance of their commentary as with their capitalization and spelling. But that figure has meaning only in the context of two figures that represent earlier steps in the process, which are always discussed first in the Child Maltreatment reports.
That’s because, if you read this Blog regularly, you probably work in or study “childwelfare.” But the Times story says, in effect: Hey, those laws fixed the problem for the poor kids and the foster kids, so we can just focus on the affluent white kids – because those kids are “mainstream.” Not even surprised?
Sixto Cancel grew up in fostercare, survived the experience and now runs Think of Us , an organization dedicated to changing the system that did him, and so many other children, so much harm. The former lawyer for the family policing agency continues: [Cancel] cites his bad experiences in fostercare. …
The latest McLawsuit reinforces ugly stereotypes about who loses children to fostercare. ● s childhood had the hallmarks of trauma and instability that DCFS is accustomed to seeing in children entering fostercare, including early childhood abuse and neglect, family violence, frequent moves, and unstable placements.
It will if some lawmakers attacking kinship fostercare get their way A few months ago on this blog, I posed a hypothetical question to some folks in Oregon. Now I’d like to pose the same question to some politicians – and some journalists – in Kansas: Suppose a couple of strangers kidnapped your child at birth and fled to Mexico.
? As almost everyone reading this probably knows, the Supreme Court has agreed to hear arguments on the constitutionality of the Indian ChildWelfare Act which The Imprint calls “a bedrock law passed in the 1970s to combat cultural genocide committed against Indigenous families.” ? They were less rushed; their kids were less rushed.
The previous round-up began by comparing a real-life case to the depiction of a dystopian childwelfare surveillance state portrayed in Jessamine Chan’s novel The School for Good Mothers Now, Let Grow has a comprehensive comparison between the novel and the real world of family policing. It is not reassuring. ?
New data from Pennsylvania confirm: When America’s childwelfare establishment fearmongers predicted that COVID would bring on a “pandemic of child abuse” it was just the usual health terrorism. Then came the corollary: Sure, you can’t see the pandemic of child abuse now – but just you wait until we get back to normal!
It is incredibly traumatic when government agents enter a person’s home and there’s the looming threat of a child removal,” [founder David] Shalleck-Klein told the Law Journal. And of course, the harm is enormous when government agents do remove a child from a parent … sometimes in the middle of the night, in incredibly traumatic ways.
Her experience in fostercare was far worse. ? These are precisely the kinds of young people the Massachusetts “Child Advocate” is trying to silence. WBTV in Charlotte continues to expose the hidden fostercare scandal in North Carolina. I have a blog post about it. ? That is just simply false. ?
Some might say it depicts a dystopian future childwelfare surveillance state. There is a right way and a wrong way to cover the release of the federal government's annual Child Maltreatment report. There’s also a right way and a wrong way to report on the use of “predictive analytics” in childwelfare.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 25,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content